A SERVICE OF

logo

8
VMWARE WHITE PAPER
Figure 4. SPECjbb2005 Performance
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
FT Disabled
FT Enabled
SPECjbb2005
Relative performance (%)
RHEL 5 64-bit, 4GB
FT trac:
1.4 Mbits/sec
3.2. Kernel Compile
This experiment shows the time taken to do kernel compile, which is both CPU and MMU intensive workload due to forking of many
parallel processes. As with the previous experiment, CPU is 100 percent utilized and thus FT performance is dependent on how well
the secondary can keep pace with the primary. This workload does some disk reads and writes, but generates no network trac.
Besides timer interrupt events, the FT logging trac includes the disk reads. As seen in theFigure 5, the performance overhead of
enabling FT was very small.
Figure 5. Kernel Compilation Performance
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
FT Disabled
FT Enabled
Kernel Compile
(lower is better)
Seconds
SLES 10 32-bit, 512MB
FT trac:
3 Mbits/sec